Tag Archives: work ethic

Talking ’bout my generation: A review of Neil Howe’s “Millennials in the Workplace”

Here’s a question: When exactly did “Talking ’bout my generation” turn into “Kids these days!”? When did the bird–once flung with such smoldering rage against “the man” –turn into a wagging finger at this current generation?

If you follow the media at all, this latest generation (aka The Dumbest Generation, if you believe Mark Bauerlein) is narcissistic, coddled, needy, overprogrammed, overprotected, can’t string together a sentence without omg, can’t utter a statement without “like”… the list goes on. Most of the complainers are we Boomers (who apparently were never narcissistic or needy), and most of the complaining zeroes in on how Millennials behave in the workplace–those flip-flop wearing, entitled kids who, as 60 Minutes intoned, want to roll in on Monday and be CEO by Friday.

But are they really that bad? Neil Howe, in his latest book with Reena Nadler, “Millennials in the Workplace” thinks not. Rather than adding to the media drumbeat about slackers and the self-indulged, he marshals the facts from numerous surveys and interviews with members of this generation (born 1982-2004), and in doing so rebuts the lazy echo chambers and paints a portrait of this generation that will not only surprise, but may just endear.

Howe is first and foremost a historian, and he brings a historian’s eye to the topic. Back in 2000, he and his coauthor at the time, William Strauss, coined the term “Millennials” to depict this 21st century generation in their book “Millennials Rising,” and he has since been deep inside this generation’s collective head.  His latest book takes his singular talent for distilling the essence of a generation and applies it to the workforce.  It’s an edifying (and optimistic) read–and employers and educators will surely want to add it to their shelves if they are to successfully adapt to the future.

So who are these so-called Millennials? In a word: boy scouts. “Trustworthy, loyal, helpful, friendly, courteous, kind, obedient, cheerful, thrifty, brave, clean, and reverent”–that’s the Boy Scout law, but it might as well be the oath for the Millennials. Well, not exactly, but close.

Howe, in fact, offers seven characteristics that define this generation just now coming full strength into the workforce (the oldest is 28). They are: special, sheltered, confident, team oriented, conventional, pressured, and achieving. The picture he paints is that of  a somewhat square, openly earnest, a bit prudish bunch of middle-of-the-roaders. In a good way. They are, in other words, a lot like their “silent generation” grandparents.

Howe sets these traits within a continuum of generations, whose lives and identities are  shaped by their moment in history–not to mention the generation immediately preceding them.  Or as Christopher Hitchens put it in Hitch-22, “for what I once heard called, ‘the most contemptible solidarity of all: the generational.’”

It’s here we begin to see the constant push-pull of history. The Greatest Generation just wanted to get on with life after a wrenching war and economic depression. They had a new lease on life and were willing to take some risks in their quest to rebuild. They in turn spawned the “silent generation,” known for “the company man” and their safe conformity. In direct reaction, along came the Boomers, who questioned everything, from gender roles to institutions of every flavor, including marriage. If “The Deer Hunter,” or “Coming Home” were the movies that captured Boomers’ coming of age, Ang Lee’s “The Ice Storm” was the movie of their marriages. Restless, bored, and above all, ignoring their children, they created the disillusioned, cynical GenX.

And now, coming full circle, we have a return to the silent generation, Howe believes. Maybe not so silent–but certainly conventional planners with plenty of merit badges. And thus, back to the Boy Scout analogy. If Boy Scouts (and Girl Scouts for that matter) are anything, they are squeaky clean and conventional.
According to Howe, this generation yearns for security, in work and in life. They don’t want to job hop; they want a commitment. They like structure on the job, with clear-cut goals and regular feedback, but they also like a relaxed atmosphere (thus the flip-flops tag). They’d much rather trade a big salary for a good work-life balance. Raised in a pressure cooker of traveling soccer leagues, SAT prep tests and high-stakes internships, they are now fixated on low-risk, long-term planning (“Be prepared!” as the Boy Scout motto admonishes), which will, they hope, minimize any missteps. They also prefer collaboration over cut-throat competition on the job. They have faith in large institutions, including corporate America and government. As Howe says, “When they are asked who’s going to improve the schools, clean up the environment, and cut the crime rate, they respond–without irony–that it will be teachers, government, and the police.” They also believe in their collective power as a generation to make their communities and the world better. They are, above all, confident in their futures. God bless ‘em.

Howe parachutes these traits into the context of colleges and the workplace and offers advice to employers and educators on how to harness these characteristics. Take their much-vaulted confidence (or narcissism, as some see it).  Unlike parents of GenXers, parents of Millennials invested heavily, both emotionally and financially, in their brood. Millennials have heard from the get-go that they are special. They’ve been told to believe in themselves, to aim high, and to not settle for less than their dream. While it can lead to complaints that kids today don’t keep their heads down and pay their dues, to Howe, the confidence manifests as a more positive thing: it energizes and conditions Millennials to set high standards and meet high expectations.

On the job, this translates into a perceived sense of entitlement. Gen-Xers “figure there must be something soft about a generation that expects so much from a mere ‘job’ or something idiotic about new employees who want to contribute so much,” says Howe. Boomers, in contrast, sulk because kids today aren’t paying their dues (because I had to..sniff, sniff). How ironic that Boomers have suddenly become their fathers: adversity builds character, young man; work purifies the soul.

Employers, rather than rolling their eyes and lecturing about impatience, should instead leverage that confidence, says Howe. They should let these young workers know their lofty goals are respected and that management will help them achieve those goals— “by giving them a whole lot of serious work to do.” They like challenge, with clear feedback. So give it to them. And don’t treat them like children. Remember, their parents included them in adult circles from early on. They’re used to adults and see no barriers between “elders” and themselves.

Howe isn’t all rose-colored glasses. For every trait, he points to a potential downside and how employers and educators can manage it. Because they are so confident, he notes, they can get a tad unrealistic. Their aspirations may not meet the realities of their “normal” skill set. Take education. Today, everyone seems to think they are college material, despite evidence suggesting otherwise. Educators, says Howe, need to more often temper Millennials’ optimism with a cold shower of realism. Not tough love per se–for pete’s sake don’t attack their optimism–but rather sound advice on career paths, for everyone. Tell the kid who is not cut out for law school that she could become a paralegal instead. It won’t kill her. Apprenticeships, career academies, job shadowing–all these things can bring the aspirations down to earth.

All in all, I came away from the book quite impressed and hopeful that this generation will indeed shake things up in the workforce, and maybe use their confidence and self-esteem to question old ways of doing things, demand new options, and create a more equal workforce than the one we have now.

I also came away worried that in this dire recession, some of these traits will meet headlong with the brick wall of “life.” Case in point: 92% of this generation, Howe says, believes that their success depends on their hard work alone (there’s that optimism and confidence again). This confidence was confirmed in a recent Heartland poll by Allstate/National Journal (see question 21 in this pdf of poll results, which finds 60% believe this to be true). This assumption might be sorely tested in a recession that is beyond their control, and that is laying off workers left and right. For too many workers, the idea that hard work alone will see you through has been laid bare by 10% unemployment, stagnating wages, disappearing benefits, and a ravaged worker-employer social contract. Corporate America is raking in the profits as they simultaneously scale back payrolls to satisfy shareholders, leaving millions of workers sidelined. They all work hard, too.

Of course, there remains the common complaint that books like these always paint with brushes that are too broad and tend to overstate the labels that are convenient to the authors’ points. Part of this is the push by publishers to have a simple, coherent message for the book. Part is human nature. We see want we want to see. Howe is a historian, and he no doubt believes history and its cousin, culture, play a big hand in shaping who we are. I do as well.  Others are psychologists and think that our interior, personal histories shape who we are. Still others are biologists and think nature shapes who we are. Most in fact, think it’s a combination of all these things. And that’s the crux. Life is complex. Not every GenXer is a slacker. Not every Millennial is a high-esteem conventionalist. No one would argue that. But as people, we make sense of the world by mental short-cuts, including labels. Those labels get us into trouble, of course (all Jews are smart, all Minnesotans are nice), but they do serve their purpose. They help make sense of life. They help us see patterns. The Millennials likely have some overarching defining characteristics, as a whole, while still offering ample variety at the personal level.

Sure not all is rosy, and sure the Millennials have their faults. Howe will be the first to admit that. But he does offer a breath of fresh air in this tired “conversation” we are having about kids these days. Out of laziness we too often opt for the vantage point of smugness that comes naturally with age. As Kierkegaard has said of life, “one is condemned to live it forward and review it backward.” It leads to a knee-jerk finger-wag. Every generation has its naysayers and boosters. And every generation, I will wager, thinks the next one is going to be the one that destroys life as we know it. Books like Howe’s remind us that not all “kids these days” are self-indulged narcissists. In fact it is quite reassuring to read that the world is not going to end tomorrow and that we may yet get to don the plaid golf pants of retirement secure in the knowledge that Millennials will have our backs.

Millennials and the work ethic, revisited

There’s been a lot of talk about young adults, especially Millennials, and their wilting work ethic.  They’re too lazy, too self-entitled, too impatient to pay their dues… the list goes on. There may be some truth to those complaints–as was true of every generation I suspect–but I suspect what those habits suggest is not a lack of work ethic, but a realigned view of what the contract between worker and employer means today.  Young adults today aren’t fools.

I just finished reading Steve Greenhouse’s The Big Squeeze: Tough Times for the American Worker. Don’t know how I missed this one when it came out (in 2008) because boy is it an eye-opener–and a really great book. Couple it with The High Wire by Peter Gosselin and you’ve got a pretty sobering view of the world of work–even before the recession.

I had a eureka moment while reading Greenhouse. No wonder kids today see the world of work differently. The young people just entering the workforce today grew up during the 1980s and 1990s, at the point when the  relationship between worker and employer had been flipped on its head.

Back in the day (up until the late 1970s), employers like GE, GM, IBM, Ford, McDonnell Douglass believed wholeheartedly that a happy worker was a productive worker. Happy meant well paid, with good benefits, a pension, and job security. As Greenhouse writes of GE’s motto: “Maximizing employment security is a prime company goal. The employee who can plan his economic future with reasonable certainty is an employer’s most productive asset.”

And it was unions who bargained for these staples of middle class life, like good pay and a pension. Such was the climate that in the 1960s, “Big Blue” IBM  had a no layoffs policy for five years. No layoffs!

The result was stability and steadily rising productivity. Indeed, productivity and wages rose hand in hand. In 1946 and 1973, worker productivity rose 104%, while median family income rose by an identical 104%. Workers had the purchasing power, mortgages were subsidized, setting off a housing boom, the Interstate Highway System fueled economic growth, and there was yet very little global competition. Golden. No wonder there was no “failure to launch” back then.

But the key here is that employers believed mightily in supporting their workers. It was a team effort. That would change forever, however, with a few swift strokes beginning in the 1970s.

The first was oil. I remember sitting in Mr. Thrond’s current affairs classroom madly calculating the cost to fill up my car if gas should go to–gasp–$1 a gallon. It was inconceivable then that it might cost $20 to fill up the car. But alas, within a few years, we were there. Inflation soared and we headed into the 1980s in deep doo-doo.

The inevitable recession that hit just as I was taking my first steps into the workforce in 1981 was nearly as bad as the one today. I was laid off twice in short order–and layoffs came with a lot more shock factor in those days, rare as they were until then. I wasn’t alone. In 1983, US Steel–the symbol of American might–laid off 15,000 workers, and the era of downsizing, right-sizing, and outsourcing would begin.

But with it would come more than just layoffs. It would usher in a new way of thinking about this social contract between worker and employer.

For a slew of interconnected reasons that I won’t bore you with here–from deregulation to Reagan busting the air traffic controllers’ strike, to rising imports–the little guy, the worker, got the shaft.

Cost controls became the driving force in corporate America. No longer beholden to their workers, corporate America was now beholden to the shareholder. Back in the 1960s, there was no need for shaving costs of production; the costs could easily be passed on to consumers. But with more global competition, that was no longer possible. So corporate heads went to the table and demanded concessions from workers. Gone were the raises; now the goal was to just hold ground against wage erosion. (But tvs and other goods were sure a lot cheaper–whew.)

Then came the Wall Street raiders, and no one was safe. Corporate execs were shaking in their boots that if their share price dropped too far, they’d be vulnerable to a hostile takeover from Michael Milken and other Darth Vader types. More cost-cutting layoffs followed.

In a blink, we’d gone from a sentiment of protecting workers in order to make the company strong, to “too much dead weight.”  “You’re ignoring the shareholder” was the mantra whenever wage or work contracts were up. Xerox in 1994 posted nearly $800 million net income, but they still laid off 10,000 workers because Wall Street didn’t think they were “lean and mean” enough. Xerox laid off workers not to stem losses but to increase profitability. In one word: Greed.

Cowed, workers gave in. Unions shriveled. One-third of all US households had a family member who lost a job between 1980 and 1996, according to Greenhouse. Jack Welch, the CEO of GE, said, “Loyalty to a company , it’s nonsense.” To his mind, says Greenhouse, loyalty bred complacency. What an about-face from “Maximizing employment security is a prime company goal,” GE’s motto in the 1960s.

Between 1973 and 2006, productivity (which once rose hand in hand with household incomes) jumped 83%. The average hourly wage? Flat.

For men with just a high school degree today, 87% of new jobs pay less than $25,000 a year. I won’t even go into the new demands on our time that employers expect, tethered as we are to our blackberries and email, or the fast one they’re pulling over on us by labeling workers temps or independent contractors. We’re killing ourselves just to stay afloat. Middle class? Ha.

So no wonder young adults today don’t see company loyalty as a goal. No wonder they question whether they should give 50 hours a week to their job. No wonder they are hoping to reinvent the workplace with more sane hours, more family-friendly balance, more “meaning” in their job. Their lives have been shaped by this cut-throat, bottom-line worldview that corporations today have. Whether white collar or blue, workers are, as Greenhouse says, squeezed.

Young adults were witness to it all. They felt their parents’ devastation at being laid off after working 70 hours a week or fear being fired. They watched as their fathers were downsized to a new job for less money. They watched as their mother, a FedX employee (who have to buy their own trucks, btw) was summarily fired because she couldn’t find a substitute for her route after doubling over with stage 4 ovarian cancer. (Greenhouse spends some time with this woman, and that story was, for me, the most sobering display of corporate heartlessness. I’ll never ship with FedX again. )

I hope this generation can demand some changes. We can’t go on like this and expect to have a middle class. There are some examples of another way. There are companies that are both profitable and treat their workers with fairness and good pay, companies like Costco and Patagonia, to name but two.

The CEO of Patagonia, in fact, reminds me of a lot of the interviews we did for Not Quite Adults. He had a vision for what he wanted from work, and he passed it on to his employees. His vision is not some socialist utopia–he still makes a tidy profit. But at the same time, he offers on-site child care, flex time, a relaxed work atmosphere where workers can skip out to go kayaking. He offers solid pay and wonderful benefits. And did I mention Patagonia makes an enviable profit every year? The key is, they’re privately owned. They are not beholden to the blasted shareholder.

But it took a visionary to buck the tide and say, you know what, work should be more meaningful and fun than it is? I’m going to start a company that lives by the ideal that work and play can be one in the same. It reminds me of the enthusiasm and charm of Sean Aiken, who tried a job a week for a year to help him figure out what he wanted to do in his life. Sounds indulgent at first, but his outlook on life and work is contagious. It’s that kind of fresh idealism and a “why not” view of the world that distinguishes Millennials I think.

So let’s encourage them to dream big and demand more from work instead of yoking them with our tired complaints about work ethic. Work ethic seems perilously close to being a sucker’s bet today. I’ll tune up my work ethic just as soon as I can once again believe that if I work hard enough, I’ll get ahead in America.

Millennials’ Work Ethic

Work ethic: Now there’s two words that get us all in a tsk-tsking mood. Ian Shapira over at the Washington Post just wrote an article on the Millennials’ lack of it, and mark my words, we’ll hear a lot about this in short order.

We all have a tendency to do it– look at the generation ahead of us and shake our  sanctimonious heads. We know the meaning of work. We know the meaning of long hours.We never screwed off at work when we were 25. Heck, we walked to work in snowstorms.

As Hamlet, I think it was, said to Ophelia: methinks she doth protest too much.  Could there be a subconscious fear in all that complaining that we’re  chumps to be killing ourselves with our work ethic?

Could we Boomers and GenXers have been bamboozled–played by a market that wants us to work longer, do more for less, so the top cats can walk away with $12 million bonuses for running a company into the ground? Er, I mean, take on the risks and stress of running a multi-million dollar corporation.

We mock young adults for their inability to commit to a job, or their unwillingness to have work take over their lives or ask for flexible schedules as if that were some sort of outrageous demand. But aren’t we really saying, hey, unfair. You HAVE to work hard because I do. I dug myself into a consumer-driven hole and so pick up a shovel.

Yes dear Boomers, we go to great lengths to hide our despair. We have no work-life balance. Instead, we tether ourselves to gadgets and convince ourselves  it’s a sign of power and prestige to have a BlackBerry strapped to our belts, buzzing away. And what do we get for it? Laid off at the drop of a hat, that’s what. Or worse, threatened with layoff so we dare not put that BlackBerry down. We can’t even get on a plane anymore and crack open a novel or an issue of Vanity Fair without feeling guilty–or lamely lie to our seatmate: my laptop battery died. No one daydreams anymore. No one listens to silence anymore. We have given ourselves over to this work ethic as if our value as humans depends on it.

So here’s to the younger generation. Take back your life en-masse. Demand a 35-hour workweek. Don’t be fooled when someone older tries to convince you that work is the source of fulfillment. That person is either overcompensating or already has a pretty cushy life (I’m talking to you Mr. Keillor). Don’t be taken in when someone excuses themselves from the dinner table to take a call from work. He’s not important. He’s a peon who has to take a call from work at 8pm.

Work hard when you’re at work. Get in the elevator at 5pm and check out.We used to do that every day, and the world didn’t stop. We still managed to become one of the leading economies in the world on a 9-5 schedule. My hat is off to the Millennials. Let’s hope they stick to their guns.