Tag Archives: credit cards

Frugality is back, or is it?

In the early days of this stubborn recession, a favorite filler article in magazines and newspapers was the return of frugality. People were saving more, the articles cheered. We were cutting back, finding a new contentment in “less is more.” Pronouncements followed that we had collectively turned over a new leaf and were never, ever returning to our debt-ridden, profligate ways.

I had my doubts. A rule of thumb is that only 10% of those who try to change a habit or way of life (think dieting) actually make it stick. I figured we’d be back on our way ringing up another unneeded sweater or tank top (shoes are an entirely different matter) before the year was out. But then I started reading the transcripts of interviews we’re doing with 22-year-olds.

Of the 60 or so interviews I’ve read, not a one has credit card debt. Most have shunned credit cards in favor of debit cards, and if they do have a credit card, they pay it off every month. I’d wager that some are glossing over the truth on this question. It’s well-documented that people don’t tell the truth to interviewers about sensitive topics like sex or money. Debt is still a bit shameful, so I would suspect that some of those who claim they have no debt actually do.

The Survey of Consumer Finances reports that in 2009, 42.8% of households whose head is under age 35 had credit card debt. Our 22-year-olds are on the young end of that age scale and so have had less time or “adult” demands to use the credit card (like those trips to Home Depot). Therefore, a smaller share might have credit card debt. On the other hand, they’re young and still reckless, and are more likely to have racked up debt on pizza and beer and a trip to see a friend across the country. But my guess is that a smaller share–30% maybe?– of 22-year-olds has credit card debt than the overall number.

The more interesting trend in the SCF data is the sharp decline in credit card debt since 2007. And those under age 35 saw the sharpest declines among all age groups. In 2007, 50.6% of those under age 35 had credit card debt. By 2008, 42.8% did. That’s a sizable change.

The young people we interviewed are terrified of senseless debt, and especially of the damage too much debt can do to one’s credit report. As this young women said, “I’m terrified of bad credit, so I try not to have any debt at all. If I can’t afford it, I know where to cut off things. I know which things are luxuries. I know which things aren’t necessary. And most things in life aren’t necessary. We just think they are.”

They’re more cost-conscious for a reason, of course: college debt meets no job. A new study by the Heldrich Center for Workforce Development at Rutgers compares the employment prospects for 2010 college graduates with those graduating in 2006.  One striking finding, as my husband pointed out, is the starting salaries. The median starting wage for a young person with a BA is $27,000, down from $30,000 among those graduating in 2006. Not only is that a 10% penalty for starting work in a recession, but as Rex said, “$27,000 isn’t all that much more than I was making as a pharmacy technician in the 1980s!”

And Rex didn’t have college debt to contend with, which is on the rise, and he had health insurance. The average amount of college debt is now up to $23,000. (Of course, the payoff is still strong, even if weakened by the recession). One-fourth of 2010 grads took a job without health insurance just to have a job, compared with 14% in 2006.

So the most recent batch of college grads is fighting for a place in the job escalator, while worried about the looming $400-500 college debt payment that will kick in soon, not to mention the rising cost of gas and food and health insurance.  No wonder they’re rethinking that night out on the town or the new trench coat for spring.

But regardless of the recession, this is also a generation that is shunning the role of passive consumers and is concerned about leaving a smaller footprint. Perhaps it is this larger shift in attitudes that is also showing up in their shopping habits. When we ask them “are you a big shopper?” the majority say no. And they often contrast their habits with their parents’, who they frequently claim love nothing more than to shop and spend.  It sounds like the makings of a generational divide, except the scolds this time around will be the kids, tsk-tsking their parents’ latest purchase.

Time will tell if the youngest generation just hitting the path to adulthood will be frugal adults or if they’ll fall into the 90% group of reformers who fall off the wagon. Perhaps they’ll become, like this young woman, simply resigned to the debt.  ”I think that everyone’s in debt and that’s just how it is….I guess I’m more understanding of money issues that I would have been four years ago, that you can only do so much about it at this point.”

My sense, though, is that there is a sea-change underfoot in how we look at consumption, although in the end, it’s all relative. This generation came of age during a run of affluence and are accustomed to a higher standard of living to begin with. What they consider “cutting back” makes my mother, who grew up in the Depression, kick into lecture mode.  I doubt this generation will start washing out and saving their generic-brand “ziploc” bags anytime soon or consider Cool-Whip containers tupperware. And don’t get me started on my mother’s penchant for cheap toilet paper. But they might step back from the ledge of consumer insanity at least a little.

Debt was once a four-letter word

I came across this graph in a NYTimes article by Catherine Rampell. As they say, a picture is worth a thousand words. (I could therefore quit right now, but let’s face it, I can’t).The graph shows our personal savings rate as a share of our disposable income.

Americans' savings rate (as share of disposable income) since 1960

In case you have eyes like mine, the far left corner is 1960, and the far right is today. That steady march downward began in 1980, and bottomed out in 2005.

Having just spent an inordinate amount of time with the Federal Reserve’s consumer spending data and other debt-related research for Not Quite Adults (much of which got left on the cutting room floor, so don’t worry), I was struck by one thing the above chart doesn’t report: the banks’ role in loosing credit cards on us, coupled with our own personal spending gluttony.

Debt was once a four-letter word in America. Scarred from the blight of the Depression, the “Greatest Generation” lived in fear of debt. For decades thereafter, the country’s ethos was to “pay as you go” with cold hard cash. The only alternative was to sit across the desk from a sanctimonious store owner and plead to be allowed to put the suit or dining room set on layaway.

Credit was confined to individual businesses and paid up at the end of the month. Many a summer evening about 5:00, in a panic because she had no idea what to make for dinner, my mother would send me to the meat locker for a pound of hamburger and to the grocery store for a head of iceberg lettuce and some potatoes. Ingredients in tow, I’d breeze through the store checkout line and tell the clerk to “put it on my mom’s account.” The clerk would duly search for the dog-eared index card in the “accounts” box and write down the total. I had no idea what “on mom’s account” really meant then, only that my mother never took much cash to the grocery store, and at the end of each month, she wrote a check for the bill. The full bill, mind you. If you got behind, the whispers began.

That was the extent of credit. Families lived within their means.  In 1957, four in ten households had no debts at all. [here's a nifty chart the Times put together on these figures.] And today? Well, not so much. In 2007,  only 25%  of Americans had no debt. Nearly half of all Americans have a credit card balance (typically about $3,000), according to the Consumer Finance Survey that the Federal Reserve Board publishes. In fact, we  Americans have on average $1.20 in debt for every dollar we earn today.

How did they do it? How did they have so little debt and manage to sock away $70,000 a year on average in liquid assets the 1960s? For one thing, that long-held value of thrift and the scourge of debt held people in check. For another, there were fewer things to buy, and they were way more expensive.

Just consider the remote control. When it first came out in the mid-1950s, only a few well-off families had one. A “Space Command” (it was the 1950s after all) remote control and television set cost a whopping $2,200 to $4,000 in today’s dollars. Today, it’s thrown in with the set and the average household has four remote controls. Technology and production efficiencies (not to mention globalization) have brought the prices of many things past generations thought luxuries into the realm of commonplace today.

But a key reason we just can’t seem to save? Credit cards. And so I finally return to the chart. A big dip in savings that began in 1980 coincided precisely with a huge change in the banking industry.

Banking, which had been a buttoned-up business for years, suddenly undid its collar and let loose beginning in the early 1980s. This shift began with the overturning of an obscure usury law in 1978, which gave credit card issuers much more leeway in charging high interest rates. Before that, the handful of credit cards available were confined to the really wealthy, and you basically agreed to hand over your first-born male child if you failed to pay up. Banks themselves were hamstrung by laws holding down the interests rates they could charge. It just wasn’t a money-maker back then to offer a credit card.

With the usury law overturned, the cash-strapped state of South Dakota saw the proverbial “gold in them hills” and lured Citibank of New York to come roost in the prairie by permitting it to charge even higher interest rates on its accounts than New York allowed. Citibank’s move unleashed the floodgates, and states like Delaware and others were suddenly scrambling to woo banks by allowing them to charge higher rates. The once moribund credit card industry, which had been stuck for some time with interest-rate ceilings that were even lower than the rate of inflation, suddenly had a new lease on life. Instant credit was suddenly available to the masses—no more disapproving looks from bankers or department store owners, no more layaway.

Perhaps it is no surprise that as credit cards hit the scene in the early 1980s, the serious rise of materialism followed. It was, after all, the era of Madonna’s material girl, of Michael Douglas’ Gordon Gekko slinking his way through Wall Street on the premise that “greed is good,” and Tom Wolfe’s bestseller Bonfire of the Vanities. A counter-culture t-shirt “no condo, no MBA, no BMW” captured the derision toward a newly minted group of free-spending big shots: the Yuppies.

The growing media blitzkrieg also promoted consumption. Debt was no longer a four-letter word, and in fact was now touted as keeping the country’s GDP afloat. Cable television, MTV, the Home Shopping Network all came of age in the 1980s, to be followed in the near future by increasingly savvy marketers and, of course, the Internet. Advertising is no longer confined to billboards, magazines, and a handful of television channels. It permeates every nook and cranny of our everyday lives. “Branding” is now a household word and U2’s Bono has convinced a generation that shopping and social responsibility go hand in hand: Buy that GAP t-shirt as part of the Red campaign and you can also save a life in Africa. But above all, buy that shirt. “Buycotts” have replaced “boycotts” as a form of protest for this latest generation.  It is no coincidence that one of the fastest-growing industries is self-storage—how to make the most of our space to organize our stuff or, even better, how to get more space somewhere else to store the stuff we don’t need but can’t possibly live without.

One could hope that this is all changing now. Savings is ticking back up, and consumers are holding back–mainly because they’re tapped the well dry. There’s a few small signs of a new ethos about shopping that at least pushes the pause button now before cha-chinging (much to economists’ chagrin). The Green Movement is taking hold and making us think about our toss-away culture. I hope this new outlook can take hold. But the cynic in me doubts it. Once those floodgates open up again and banks start loosening the credit lines (which they inevitably will), it will be back to business as usual. There are too many forces working against us: Madison Avenue, Wall Street, our short historical memories, to name three big ones. Maybe though, just maybe, this generation has learned something and will push back on those forces that convince us that spending and shopping are good for the country.

New consumer protections for young adults

I just finished reading the galleys to Not Quite Adults (yay). It’s a mini thrill to see the book as it will look on the page. But why is it you notice so much more when reading the typeset page than when reading the Word version? Is it because you’re reading as a reader, in chunks, and not word by word, as when writing? Whatever the reason, you notice so many more things this time around.

I was struck in particular by the insecurity so many young adults are feeling–either about the uncertainty of their futures or the certainty of their current, stuck lives. So many young people fell into the latter camp, trapped too early in dead-end, low-paid jobs, or juggling two part-time jobs, struggling to find affordable child care, surprised by a sudden credit card fee, never quite digging out from that last unexpected trip to the emergency room. It’s always something, said one young mother, who was living in a motel room with her husband and two kids at the time of our interview. Other young adults are just getting out of college or in the midst of it and not quite sure what they want to do “when they grow up.” Boy do I remember how that felt.

It’s the other kind of insecurity, however–the kind stemming from pinched choices–that a recent report by Demos address. It directs the cause of some of this precarious situation to the free-for-all on Wall Street and the lack of any regulation on financial institutions. As the report says:

Young adults are paying a stiff price for the economic havoc wreaked by Wall Street. The thirty-year campaign against even the most basic forms of government regulation has drastically dismantled the rules that once ensured dynamic, competitive financial markets. A return to economic stability and accountability is important for young people not only for their immediate economic livelihood but to guarantee that America has a future middle class.

A middle class–something once just taken for granted, but now at risk of shrinking to a sliver of its former self. The free-for-all, deregulated financial sector certainly set up a lot of young adults to fall, like Sheila, one of the young women we interviewed for Not Quite Adults. As she said:

We got credit cards because a mortgage company said we needed credit cards to build our credit so we could buy a house. Well, we ended up getting credit cards adn screwing up our credit. Then my husband was laid off in the winter because his job was seasonal then. That really put us behind with credit cards, and now we’re trying to get back out of debt, but it’s so hard. You’re getting charged with all these fees every month. They don’t understand. We pay them $50 payment and the next months it’s $100 more. How are we supposed to get caught up?

The proposed Consumer Financial Protection Agency can help people like Sheila stay out of that quicksand. The bill, which has passed the House and is in the Senate, is designed to regulate home mortgages, car loans and credit cards, as well as rein in some of the more egregious game-rigging that the hedge funds and the big banks cooked up.

As the Demos report notes:

Restoring basic fairness to consumer finance is critical for the next generation of savers and homeowners. The …Consumer Financial Protection Agency…would be the first government entity whose primary mission is to protect the economic wellbeing of ordinary Americans. The CFPA would have jurisdiction to block deceptive credit card terms, require student lenders to follow fair rules of the road, require mortgage brokers to take steps to offer borrowers loans they can afford, and let first-time car buyers put their money toward vehicles instead of excessive interest rate payments.

Sure, people like Sheila and her husband were complicit in their own debt. They spent the money after all. But the credit cards and mortgage lenders are also complicit. They blatantly took advantage of people who didn’t have the financial savvy to figure out the complicated ins and outs of mortgages and the fine print on credit cards. They were sneaky. Many of their doings might not have been illegal, but they were certainly unethical. And it is those financial shenanigans that have landed us in this mess, a mess that this generation now coming of age will feel for a long, long time.